Ll to ll to lli to q n ffn fqa i to c fl r

• • • • -------------------- ll°1 1870 to ll~ 1871 to lli 1903 to ""' q:n ffn- ~1fqa I

~~ 1921 to c '1&fl ,r > if'~ 11N , ez1 " ft" ~ , q-, ,

~•4'11'{ 9••fffl I - ... ~~ l.928 to

:114

18~i .~ , .. ..

!f' ~ ~ mT I

1a imf , ll~ 1930 fo 1a 1144ft ~ 1930 to \Ft 1930 lo V=t 1931 fo ~~ 1932 fo '"{T1ffff~'ff-;fr~,~ ~ ~ t tit f.=tt ~ f~ ql06f

~ffl'f.t~,nwe., i~'fm ceq11f en ftizrr•;ru ~ 1J'{"A mT I

lf=t 1937 to f lf~ 1937 fo

1a ~ , ~, 194a to

• ~~fl'~lffl~rfir"~, .. .. ,ff if~ - l'fA 1n" ~ 1'♦16 ,rii ~ lf~• ~ 1)1ft• I ~ ~• ft{tqfby ""• 'fft•IUt ~ I C

tf\ {~ft , ~ 1944 to ,:fo 1t•tl n...; 'lffl eq'"' ~ • :JT ~

a,,lJ:akfi. ~ ~qfnM

( q f{"fit'e. • • • • JUOOM&Nr s~ pt. Govind Ballabh Pant has been up for proaecution I\ under Sec 9 ( A) or the Indian Salt Act XII ot 1882 - tor Manufacturing salt without Lieence , in oontravention or the .lfrt. outes Framed under said Act~ 2,th May 1930 at ICis hnapur in /1 the compound of one Jai deo' s house • The cirsumstancea that led to the arrest and the prosecution of the accessed are as follows: The circle Inspector of Police recejved information that

the o~eeesed has amounced his intention of manufacturing salt on the 25'tb May - He accordingly w-e.11t to the spot , along with

S .o. Talile Tal and other Police officers between 2 and 3 P. • He foutld the pan El: . 1 in which the salt was being Prepared •

ll•n• Placed on the fire and the accused seated near it .He al10 round the canister Ext. 2 containing s01111 earth dissolved

279 1n water - apparently thestutt out ot which salt val being prepared • The freshly prepared salt va• also round aprend out on a piece or clath Bxt. 3 • Thi1 salt as well as other thenge tound there were ta.ken possession ot by the mapector. The o.ccused pt. Govind Be.llabh Pant va• arrested and has been

procecuted as described above • lt being a sW111on a case, the• accused wa• examined at the very out set • \hen questioned about the orrence. The accused replied , that he did not want to take • part in th1• trial but admitted that he did manufacture salt 1tant1onally. With the object or breaking the lav in accordanc with the man date or the congress, Thi■ is a clear admission ot the ettence and there is no reason im:, the accused should not be co11Yicted on this veT7 admission , I , however , examined the circle Inspector who arrested the accused and Kasi Amir Hussain who witnessed the manutact~ot salt .The seizure and arrest • Their -4.vidence also goes to sbov beyond

• 280 any doubt that the accused did manufacture salt 1n contra- vention or the eralea on the subject • In view or his own admission supported by the erldence on the record , I tind: the accused pt. Gcwind Ballabh Pant guilty ot the offense under aec 9 Ca) or the lhdian 1alt Act- XII ot 1882 - and convict h:1Jll accordingq • I sentence pt. Govind Be.llabh Pant to Six month S. I • Sd. J.M. Qlarle1

26.5.30 Magistrate 1st Clas,.

a- .. 3- • "ffl'f'T=f~ • • +- ~~ • .. ._ . &- • ◄ l'I RI ~

C

,i04uft : ----~---- • • • • • < \t1 1871 to~ ~11918 to l'l1' 'J•• fln> < lf1 1918 to t \t~ 1942 i<Jff 9,1111ft > ( ~1 1946 to ~ 'ff: 94iT f31 ) < lf1 ~30 io ~ ~1 1931 to ~ 9.,-fi!ff > < ~1 1922 to~ ~1 1945 to~ 9•t ~ >